The Presidential election: UDP Research

Today in the TV news appeared a piece of news that trembled the politics world. The reason was results of a research of “Diego Portales” University that present that the official candidate to the President, Eduardo Frei, exceeded to the candidate to the “Coalición por el Cambio” Sebastián Piñera in a second attempt. The interest of this news was that the results indicate a change respect the tendency that was seen in months ago.

This news and research have many repercussions. In the command of Eduardo Frei look optimistic this results, because although, says, the election will be hard, “La Concertación” win, and will have a fifth government. In change, in the Opposition, the command of Sebastián Piñera, says, the spite of that the research don`t is favorable; they think that the results of election in December will be different to the research of today, and they win the Presidential election.

Evidently, this report affects my community, city and country, well, the command of Eduardo Frei and Sebastián Piñera begin a campaign ever more powerful, situation that will be see for the citizen.

Improving your faculty facilities

In my faculty, the current situation is heterogeneous, because this situation depends on a lot variable. In respect to the infrastructure, I think that is good, we have a great computers room, a library, and good study rooms. However, I believe in respect to the faculty politics to enter aren`t the most suitable, because in general the people who enter in this place come from rich sectors. Moreover, some subjects aren`t good, and the students are left without enough knowledge.
For this, I believe that the worst things that the faculty has are the politics to enter to the faculty and the deficient subjects, and that is why, that are the two things that should be change.
For this, the first step that should be the directors, is first change the politics to enter to the faculty, to increase the number of poor people that can enter in the university, in second place, change the teachers that don`t work good, that no teach to the students, to place put a good educationalist and experts in their field.
Like that, the benefits should be great; we have a heterogeneous composition in social class terms and with this, they could have good subjects with good teachers for all.

Confusion over Labour's plan to house young mothers in supervised homes

The prospect of supervised homes for teenage mothers was one of most relevant policy announcements Gordon Brown made in his speech. About the policy Brown said in the conference that: "I do think it's time to address a problem that for too long has gone unspoken, the number of children having children. For it cannot be right, for a girl of 16, to get pregnant, be given the keys to a council flat and be left on her own,"

You can the news in this link: http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/sep/29/young-mothers-housing-labour-conference

Education

My education in the high school was in general very bad. Respect the subjects, only philosophy and history were good subjects. Respect the teachers, in general i had a very good relationship with them, especially with my language teacher. Respect the technology, my high school had a very good infrastructure, but wasn’t used.

The high school education that i received haven’t really affected the decisions that I have made in my life. Maybe my decisions have been more affected for the people that I join and that with they talked.

For my experience, I think that the government and congress should promote in first place a new legislation that gives a access more equal to all the people for a quality education and in second term I would propose more money for education.

Definitely, the people don’t have responsibility for education that receives. Are structural conditions that determine which is the education that everyone receives. But, it’s also true that only when the student is ready to learn, the teacher can teach.